🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear he could survive losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered an important European final versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive losing at home against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, undermining some of the club’s most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight defender in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the irony here: a coach who frequently berated at his players for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode seems to paint the director in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, based on his nine months of experience at Southampton, to regard him as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which the club's competitors are now justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Conflict Over Formation and Philosophy

To illustrate, this was the director who having been part of the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his favored formation. Naturally, these pleas met a certain resistance. However, such directives hold greater authority when issued from the mouth of a man the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he might agree to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause activated. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like him – simply operate on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite the same as being ready to receive.

The Ultimate Authority In the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the directives of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt data science and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he declared that United’s style of play “shall be determined in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical football matters, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply superior. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a modern arena that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and energy to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many companies have such individuals set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If managers were once chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged whereas the people who hired him continue to make errors another day.

The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism in action: the rise of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices remain untouchable, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then fire him for playing excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and then bin him for requiring too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.